Re-Implementing the SAP Warehouse Management Module in a Chemical
Manufacturing Operation
SITUATION
This particular client, headquartered overseas, produces a variety of chemical products for commercial applications, including additives to paints, packaging and motor oil products. It has a reputation for consistent quality and above average customer service.
Eighteen months ago, the client added a warehouse management (WM) module to its SAP system with a goal of enhancing material movement between the warehouse and production areas through the use of automated picking lists and RDIF scanners. However, the implementation of the new module was poorly executed and resulted in minimal knowledge of and compliance to procedures at the process operator level.
A physical inventory at year-end resulted in over $500K in write-offs. Six months later, another inventory count found an additional $287K in material variance. Faced with these challenges, the company engaged LEP to assess the opportunities for improvement and propose a way forward. |
APPROACH
The analysis confirmed that the WM module works as designed,
but it is not user-friendly, particularly with lack of proper training.
LEP recommended and the client agreed that it was necessary to re-implement the system by:
-
Preparing a process flow map of the current system to determine interfaces and breakdown points.
-
Simplifying the current system flow to capture the five major
operator interfaces identified during the analysis, while eliminating
the use of phantom locations.
-
Designing and delivering operator training (on-the-floor) that
establishes the value of accuracy, stresses the ultimate simplicity
of the system and restores operator confidence.
-
Implementing an error tracking system to perform root cause
analysis and provide a basis for operator feedback.
-
Reviewing historical volumes to construct an ABC analysis of both
raw materials and finished products.
-
Utilizing the ABC analysis to reconfigure the warehouse with an
orientation towards the production area.
-
Establishing a continuous process improvement team to sustain
the results captured by the project.
RESULTS
All project objectives were met. The year-end physical inventory resulted in less than $10K in write-offs. The client realized a 10:1 return on investment.
|